Volume 11, Issue 2
ISSN 2516-1210 (Print), 2515-9887 (Online)
The rules of forfeiture prevent those who have committed a crime against another person from benefitting from that person’s will or law of intestacy. The common law rules on forfeiture, however, are subject to exceptions which have not been clearly defined. The recent decision in Morris v Morris [2024] EWHC 2554 addressed the crime of assisted suicide in the context of forfeiture and showed considerable discretion by holding that accompanying the deceased to a suicide clinic will probably not engage the forfeiture rule, depending on the likelihood of a prosecution under the Suicide Act 1961. Any additional acts, however, that would amount to assisting a suicide under the 1961 Act (and under the new Assisted Suicide Bill 2024), would continue to engage the rule of forfeiture. This note will look at the rationale behind the Morris decision, its historical context, and how it provides some clarity to the field.
Corruption in Albania is examined through an interdisciplinary lens combining psychological theories and socio-legal analysis to reveal how cognitive biases, social norms, and institutional weaknesses interact to sustain corrupt practices. The study highlights how moral disengagement, anchoring bias, and social normalization embed unethical conduct within political and bureaucratic systems, undermining legal compliance and eroding public trust. Historical and cultural legacies, including patronage networks and kinship obligations, shape perceptions that justify misconduct as loyalty or necessity, complicating reform efforts. Structural anti-corruption measures often fall short without addressing underlying psychological mechanisms that rationalize and perpetuate corruption. Integrating behavioral interventions, such as moral identity reinforcement, peer group realignment, and transparency-enhancing strategies, with legal reforms is proposed to disrupt entrenched patterns. Emphasis is placed on consistent enforcement, visible accountability, and community-level norm recalibration to restore institutional credibility and support democratic integrity. This approach underscores the importance of aligning internalized ethical values with formal governance structures to achieve sustainable reductions in corruption and strengthen rule of law in transitional democracies.
This Special Issue comprises the proceedings from the Roundtable Unconference that took place at Hult International Business School, London, on 3 December 2025. The event brought together researchers and practitioners with expertise in psychology and law who shared their insights into the importance of psychology-law fusion in addressing pressing societal challenges.
psychology and law; judges; lawyers; psychologists; interdisciplinary evaluation; psychology and justice; knowledge fusion
